<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Washington Winemaker &#187; equipment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/category/equipment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog</link>
	<description>Growing grapes and making wine in Bellevue</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:00:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Titratable Acidity: A Better Way?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2008/02/05/titratable-acidity-a-better-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2008/02/05/titratable-acidity-a-better-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[enology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement & testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winemaking clubs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2008/02/05/titratable-acidity-a-better-way/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man, his contraption, and a different way
I learned of a different way to test for titratable acidity, the other day. At the last meeting of the Puget Sound Amatuer Wine and Beer Makers club, Don Proctor demonstrated this method using an odd looking device. He used ordinary baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) to neutralize the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>A man, his contraption, and a different way</h2>
<p>I learned of a different way to test for titratable acidity, the other day. At the last meeting of the Puget Sound Amatuer Wine and Beer Makers club, Don Proctor demonstrated this method using an odd looking device. He used ordinary baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) to neutralize the acid in a test sample. The important thing about this chemical reaction is that it gives off carbon dioxide (CO2) in direct proportion to the amount of acid neutralized. Now his device didn&#8217;t look so odd. The stoppers, tubing, glass cylinders, and green liquid were used to measure the amount of CO2, and if you know how much wine was in your sample and how much CO2 was produced, you can find the acidity of your sample.</p>
<h2>The difference is in what you measure</h2>
<p>This method, and conventional titration, both aim to measure the amount of acid by neutralizing it with a base. In a titration, you add a carefully measured amount of base until all the acid is neutralized. It&#8217;s important that you add just enough base to neutralize all the acid &#8211; no more and no less &#8211; because you determine the amount of acid in the sample from the amount of base that you add. Because you have to measure the base so precisely, it&#8217;s best to add it in liquid form. That means you need to have a solution of base at a precise concentration. Now, this is easy to find, but it&#8217;s expensive and it has a short shelf life.</p>
<h2>Why the new way is better</h2>
<p>You need to neutralize all the acid in Mr Proctor&#8217;s method too, but you don&#8217;t need to know how much base it took to do that. That means you don&#8217;t need to determine the end point (no pH meter) and you can use cheap, shelf stable baking soda instead of expensive perishable sodium hydroxide. That&#8217;s a big plus, as I found out the last time I <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/02/just-do-it/">ran out of chemicals</a>. I&#8217;m going to have to get one of these contraptions!</p>
<p><em><br />
<h2>Update 9/8/2008: A picture is worth a thousand words</h2>
<p>If you&#8217;re having trouble visualizing it, take a look at <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2008/09/08/titratable-acidity-a-better-way-2/">this photo</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2008/02/05/titratable-acidity-a-better-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Racking The Merlot And Cherry Wine</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/12/18/racking-the-merlot-and-cherry-wine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/12/18/racking-the-merlot-and-cherry-wine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winemaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/12/18/racking-the-merlot-and-cherry-wine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I made good use of my new 3-gallon (11 liter) carboys this weekend. Three 1-gallon (3.785 liter) jugs, plus one wine bottle, of cherry wine fit perfectly into the carboy. Eight gallons (30 liters) of Merlot filled a 5-gallon (19 liter) and a 3-gallon carboy with a little left over in a wine bottle.
Higher yield [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made good use of my new <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/26/the-unappreciated-3-gallon-carboy/">3-gallon (11 liter) carboys</a> this weekend. Three 1-gallon (3.785 liter) jugs, plus one wine bottle, of <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/06/30/cherry-wine-recipe/">cherry wine</a> fit perfectly into the carboy. Eight gallons (30 liters) of Merlot filled a 5-gallon (19 liter) and a 3-gallon carboy with a little left over in a wine bottle.</p>
<p><strong>Higher yield from red wine?</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m still surprised by the yield from my Merlot grapes. I <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/17/making-wine-from-purchased-grapes/">bought 100 lb</a> (45.45 kg) in October, and I was expecting about 5-gallons of wine, which is about what I&#8217;m getting from the 100 lb of Chardonnay grapes I bought at the same time. I think I know what happened. I treated the Merlot with pectic enzyme, then fermented it like any red wine, so the skin and pulp were soaking in a water-turning-to-alcohol mixture for a week. This, to say nothing the fermenting yeast, broke down cell walls and membranes making it a lot easier to squeeze liquid out of the pulp. The Chardonnay, on the other hand, were pressed immediately after crushing. The result: more Merlot wine from the same amount of grapes. I&#8217;ll have to make a note of this for next year to see if the extra yield from red wine is real or if this year&#8217;s experience was just a fluke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/12/18/racking-the-merlot-and-cherry-wine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking For A Carboy &#8211; Found A Homebrew Shop</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/28/looking-for-a-carboy-found-a-homebrew-shop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/28/looking-for-a-carboy-found-a-homebrew-shop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/28/looking-for-a-carboy-found-a-homebrew-shop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The local homebrew shop closest to my house was out of 3-gallon carboys. I was in a hurry, so I decided to look around for other stores in the area and I&#8217;m glad I did. Not only did Larry&#8217;s Brewing Supply have the carboys in stock, they sold them for 20% less. The two stores [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The local homebrew shop closest to my house was out of <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/26/the-unappreciated-3-gallon-carboy/">3-gallon carboys</a>. I was in a hurry, so I decided to look around for other stores in the area and I&#8217;m glad I did. Not only did <a href="http://www.larrysbrewsupply.com/">Larry&#8217;s Brewing Supply</a> have the carboys in stock, they sold them for 20% less. The two stores have different &#8220;personalities.&#8221; From the sophisticated checkout to the bar codes, my local shop is clean, bright, and modern. Larry&#8217;s is a small shop with a warehouse feeling to it. Hand written signs indicate prices, and Larry&#8217;s (yep, that&#8217;s really the owner&#8217;s name) collection of old (probably not &#8220;antique&#8221; yet, but getting close) bottle cappers adorn the checkout area. Helpful, friendly staffs make both stores good places to buy homebrew and winemaking supplies, but when you buy a lot of supplies and equipment, like I do, comparison shopping can really pay off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/28/looking-for-a-carboy-found-a-homebrew-shop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Unappreciated 3-Gallon Carboy</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/26/the-unappreciated-3-gallon-carboy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/26/the-unappreciated-3-gallon-carboy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/26/the-unappreciated-3-gallon-carboy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve got a little over eight gallons (30 liters) of pressed Merlot that needs to be racked soon. What do you rack eight gallons of wine into? A 5-gallon carboy and three 1-gallon jugs would work, but the best way is to use a 3-gallon (11 liter) carboy. You don&#8217;t hear as much about the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a little over eight gallons (30 liters) of <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/22/pressing-merlot/">pressed Merlot</a> that needs to be racked soon. What do you rack eight gallons of wine into? A 5-gallon carboy and three 1-gallon jugs would work, but the best way is to use a 3-gallon (11 liter) carboy. You don&#8217;t hear as much about the 3-gallon carboy as you do about it&#8217;s big brother. There are many times it could have made my life easier though, and I think it&#8217;s finally time to add one to my roster of winemaking equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/26/the-unappreciated-3-gallon-carboy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calibrating A pH Meter: Maybe The New Buffer Solution Will Do</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/14/calibrating-a-ph-meter-maybe-the-new-buffer-solution-will-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/14/calibrating-a-ph-meter-maybe-the-new-buffer-solution-will-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[enology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance & cleaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/14/calibrating-a-ph-meter-maybe-the-new-buffer-solution-will-do/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I racked and measured four batches the other day, and it gave me the opportunity to size up my new buffer solution. I recorded TA values for three of those batches while I was still using my old buffer solution to calibrate my pH meter, and they shouldn&#8217;t have changed much. Here are the data:


Name
Old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I racked and measured <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/13/racking-topping-up-and-no-more-headspace/">four batches</a> the other day, and it gave me the opportunity to size up my new <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/07/calibrating-a-ph-meter-buffer-solution/">buffer solution</a>. I recorded TA values for three of those batches while I was still using my old buffer solution to calibrate my pH meter, and they shouldn&#8217;t have changed much. Here are the data:</p>
<table style="border-collapse: collapse" border="0" cellpadding="4" width="80%">
<tr>
<td><strong>Name</strong></td>
<td><strong>Old Buffer</strong></td>
<td><strong>New Buffer</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rhubarb Wine</td>
<td>4/22/07: 6 g/L</td>
<td>11/10/07: 7 g/L</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oregano Wine</td>
<td>8/12/07: 6 g/L</td>
<td>11/10/07: 5.5 g/L</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Grocery Store Chablis</td>
<td>8/23/07: 7 g/L</td>
<td>11/10/07: 6 g/L</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The old and new measurements are all within 1 g/L. Since I&#8217;m measuring my liquid volumes with the plastic syringe that came with my cheap acid test kit, not pipettes or burettes, I don&#8217;t think I can claim accuracy better than 1 g/L. So I&#8217;m not going to say the new buffer is great, but any error its causing is pretty small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/14/calibrating-a-ph-meter-maybe-the-new-buffer-solution-will-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calibrating A pH Meter: Buffer Solution</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/07/calibrating-a-ph-meter-buffer-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/07/calibrating-a-ph-meter-buffer-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[enology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance & cleaning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/07/calibrating-a-ph-meter-buffer-solution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is a buffer solution?
You need to calibrate your pH meter for it to work properly, but to do that, you need to immerse it in a solution of known pH. Buffer solutions are the way out of that little chicken and egg problem. These are made of precisely measured ingredients that combine to form [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What is a buffer solution?</strong></p>
<p>You need to <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/07/12/calibrating-a-ph-meter/">calibrate</a> your pH meter for it to work properly, but to do that, you need to immerse it in a solution of known pH. Buffer solutions are the way out of that little chicken and egg problem. These are made of precisely measured ingredients that combine to form a solution of known, and highly stable, pH. It would be pretty tough for most home winemakers to make their own buffer solution, so it&#8217;s a good thing that they&#8217;re widely available at homebrew shops.</p>
<p><strong>Not all buffers are created equal</strong></p>
<p>I was out of pH 4 buffer, and bought some more from a local shop. The first difference I noticed, between the new and old solutions, was the color &#8211; the new one was pink and the old one was colorless. There were two other differences, though, that were more significant. Each solution came with a temperature table that indicated the precise pH, to two decimal places, at a given temperature. The old solution listed the pH from 0C to 95C in 5 degree increments, and over that wide range the pH varied from 4.00 to 4.22. The new solution listed the pH at 20C (pH = 4.02) and 30C (pH = 4.99). The detail and temperature stability of the old solution gave me a lot of confidence. The new one is &#8230; pink.</p>
<p><strong>How to shop for buffer solution</strong></p>
<p>My pH meter had been pretty steady, often needing no adjustment at all between uses. When it had drifted, it was only by 0.02 or 0.03. So I was taken aback to see my pH meter read 3.74 when I first put it in the new solution. Maybe the meter drifted by that much since the last time I used it, but maybe the pH of these two &#8220;pH 4&#8243; buffers differed by 0.26. I was out of the old solution, so I couldn&#8217;t check this. The new solution is fresher, so it&#8217;s possible that the old one drifted over time, but I&#8217;ve got my doubts about the new one. Live and learn. The next time I buy buffer solution, and that&#8217;s going to be pretty soon, I&#8217;ll try to find out when it was made and how much detail is in the temperature table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/11/07/calibrating-a-ph-meter-buffer-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Clean A Big Fermenter Without Scrubbing</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/26/how-to-clean-a-big-fermenter-without-scrubbing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/26/how-to-clean-a-big-fermenter-without-scrubbing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance & cleaning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/26/how-to-clean-a-big-fermenter-without-scrubbing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I hate about winemaking
Once I pressed the Merlot, it was time to watch airlocks bubble as the wine fermented out and then slowly cleared. It was also time to clean the fermenter. This is on the list, along with washing bottles, of my least favorite things about making wine. The best way to do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What I <em>hate</em> about winemaking</strong></p>
<p>Once I <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/22/pressing-merlot/">pressed the Merlot</a>, it was time to watch airlocks bubble as the wine fermented out and then slowly cleared. It was also time to clean the fermenter. This is on the list, along with <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/06/02/bottle-washing-day/">washing bottles</a>, of my <em>least</em> favorite things about making wine. The best way to do this is to get someone else to do it, maybe a friend or loved one. This isn&#8217;t as easy as you might think, so sometimes we must take drastic action. Yes, there are times when we have to do it ourselves.</p>
<p><strong>If you gotta do it, do it the easy way</strong></p>
<p>So how do you clean a 24 gallon fermenter? It&#8217;s big enough that bending over, or tipping it on it&#8217;s side and crawling in, to scrub the inside and bottom will be hard on your back and knees. Besides, why scrub when you don&#8217;t have to? I like to rinse it with a garden hose right after I&#8217;m done with it, that way nothing has a chance to dry and harden on the surface. Next, I fill it with water and a detergent, I like to use <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0007A5KS0?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=washinwinema-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B0007A5KS0">Oxiclean</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=washinwinema-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B0007A5KS0" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;"/>. You&#8217;re not going to want to move it while it&#8217;s full, so make sure it&#8217;s in a good spot before you fill it. You&#8217;ll want it someplace where you can leave it for a long time, someplace where you can tip it on its side, to drain, without getting it dirty, and someplace near a garden hose. The garage, just inside the door to the driveway, works for me. I like to let it soak for several hours, often overnight. After soaking, I&#8217;ll drain it and rinse with the garden hose. After I&#8217;ve rinsed thoroughly and I think I&#8217;ve gotten every bit of detergent, I&#8217;ll fill it with clean water and let it sit for a while (again, several hours or even overnight). I want to make sure there isn&#8217;t a thin film of detergent on the bottom or on the sides. I drain it after that and turn it upside down to drip dry over my utility sink.</p>
<p><strong>Not as bad as it seemed</strong></p>
<p>As you can see, this process can take several days, but for most of that time, the fermenter is just soaking. It takes very little time and effort on your part, leaving you free to make more wine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/26/how-to-clean-a-big-fermenter-without-scrubbing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pressing Merlot</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/22/pressing-merlot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/22/pressing-merlot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[enology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/22/pressing-merlot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When to press red wine
When making red wine from grapes, you crush the grapes then ferment them. You leave the skins and pulp in the fermenting wine, for a time, then you press it and leave the solids behind. The amount of time will vary according to the style of wine you&#8217;re making. Three or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>When to press red wine</strong></p>
<p>When making red wine from grapes, you crush the grapes then ferment them. You leave the skins and pulp in the fermenting wine, for a time, then you press it and leave the solids behind. The amount of time will vary according to the style of wine you&#8217;re making. Three or four days, will yield a light bodied wine. A few weeks will yield a tannic, full bodied wine. A good full bodied wine requires top notch fruit, and since I don&#8217;t have detailed information on how my grapes were grown I decided to make a medium bodied wine, and pressed after a week.<br />
<br clear="all" /><br />
<img src="/pic/20071020 pressing merlot.jpg" alt="Pressing Merlot in a bladder press on 10/20/07" title="Pressing Merlot on 10/20/07" vspace="10" /><br />
<br clear="all" /><br />
Here you can see the bladder press I used to press my Merlot.</p>
<p><strong>Using a bladder press</strong></p>
<p>I loaded the fermenting wine, pulp skins and all, into a perforated cylinder. At first, &#8220;free run wine&#8221; flowed out of the perforations, leaving seeds, pulp and other debris behind. Later, I applied water pressure to inflate a rubber bladder that squeezed the grapes against the sides of the cylinder and &#8220;press wine&#8221; flowed out. Altogether, I got over eight gallons (30+ liters), which is more than I expected from my 100 lb (45+ kg) of grapes. I was going by the rule of thumb that 100 lb would yield 5 gallons (about 19 liters).<br />
<br clear="all" /><br />
<img src="/pic/20071020 pressed wine in carboys.jpg" alt="Pressed Merlot in 5-gallon carboys, press wine in the carboy with the orange handle and free run in the carboy on the right. 10/20/07" title="Pressed Merlot in 5-gallon carboys on 10/20/07" vspace="10" /><br />
<br clear="all" /><br />
I kept the free run and press wine separate. The carboy on the left, with the orange handle, contains press wine, while the carboy on the right contains free run. It&#8217;s still fermenting, and I expect it to finish in another week. Once it starts to clear, I&#8217;ll rack into fresh containers for aging. At that point, I&#8217;ll have to decide if I want to keep the press and free run separate or combine them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/10/22/pressing-merlot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primary Fermenters: What size do you need?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/09/25/primary-fermenters-what-size-do-you-need/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/09/25/primary-fermenters-what-size-do-you-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winemaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/09/25/primary-fermenters-what-size-do-you-need/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m excited about making red wine from grapes this year. It will be my first red, and I needed some new equipment. My largest fermenter has a ten gallon capacity, which is enough for five or six gallons of white wine, but too small for five gallons of red wine. Red wine is fermented on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m excited about making <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/09/19/buying-grapes-to-make-wine/">red wine from grapes</a> this year. It will be my first red, and I needed some new equipment. My largest fermenter has a ten gallon capacity, which is enough for five or six gallons of white wine, but too small for five gallons of red wine. Red wine is fermented on the skins, so you have a larger volume of must than for the same amount of white wine. All that skin and pulp gets forced to the surface, by CO2, forming a &#8220;cap.&#8221; So the fermenter has to be bigger than the amount of finished wine, to handle the skin and pulp and to contain the cap. How much bigger? A good rule of thumb is that every 5 lb of grapes require 1 gallon of capacity (0.6 kg/liter). For 100 lb (45.5 kg) of grapes, then, I&#8217;ll need a 20 gallon (75 liter) fermenter. My local homebrew shop carries 24 gallon (90 liter) fermenters. It&#8217;s ok to have a little more room than you need, but it&#8217;s a little messy if you&#8217;re short so I bought one. All I need now are some grapes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/09/25/primary-fermenters-what-size-do-you-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calibrating A pH Meter</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/07/12/calibrating-a-ph-meter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/07/12/calibrating-a-ph-meter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[enology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance & cleaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/07/12/calibrating-a-ph-meter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To work properly, a pH meter must be calibrated. You do this by preparing (or buying) buffered solutions of known pH and testing the meter against them. My meter uses a two point calibration. It works by immersing the meter in the first buffer solution (pH 6.86 in this case) then reading the pH and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/pic/20070711 - beginning first calibration.jpg" alt="pH meter, in a champaign glass about a quarter full of 6.86 buffered solution, reads a pH of 6.17 at 31.4 Celsius." title="Beginning pH Meter's First Calibration" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" />To work properly, a pH meter must be calibrated. You do this by preparing (or buying) buffered solutions of known pH and testing the meter against them. My meter uses a two point calibration. It works by immersing the meter in the first buffer solution (pH 6.86 in this case) then reading the pH and temperature values.<br />
<br clear="all" /><br />
<br clear="all" /><br />
<img src="/pic/20070711 - first calibration complete.jpg" alt="pH meter, in a champaign glass about a quarter full of 6.86 buffered solution, reads a pH of 6.85 at 31.8 Celsius." title="pH Meter's First Calibration Complete" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" />You turn a calibration screw until the meter shows the correct pH for the given temperature (the bottle of buffer solution has a table of temperature and pH values). The pH of the &#8220;6.86&#8243; buffer solution that I&#8217;m using is 6.85 at 30 Celsius, the closest temperature on the correction table to 31.4, so I turned the calibration screw to 6.85. That&#8217;s the first &#8220;point&#8221; of the two point calibration process. The second step is exactly the same but with a different buffer solution (ph 4).<br />
<br clear="all" /><br />
<br clear="all" /><br />
I&#8217;ll use my new toy &#8211; um, important scientific instrument &#8211; along with my simple acid titration kit to analyze my <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/06/08/oregano-wine/">oregano wine</a>. Fermentation has been very slow and I&#8217;m afraid the pH of the wine has fallen so low that it&#8217;s inhibiting the yeast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/07/12/calibrating-a-ph-meter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
