<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Simple Mead Recipe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/</link>
	<description>Growing grapes and making wine in Bellevue</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:59:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erroll</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/comment-page-1/#comment-35216</link>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/#comment-35216</guid>
		<description>You and Mrs. Coager are romantics! There&#039;s something appealing about connecting with the past, and if that&#039;s what you want to do then an old recipe made with old methods might do the trick. I think you&#039;re risking infection or other faults (if bad luck should strike, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2009/12/03/mulled-wine/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mulling spices&lt;/a&gt; might save the day).

Personally, I&#039;d rather make good mead consistently with modern methods, then curl up with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0553381687?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=washinwinema-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0553381687&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Game of Thrones&lt;/a&gt; or another good book. Have you read the Song of Ice and Fire books? The author has been taking his time with the latest installment, but it&#039;s world class fantasy that&#039;s perfect with a glass (or mug or tankard or ...) of mead.

Erroll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and Mrs. Coager are romantics! There&#8217;s something appealing about connecting with the past, and if that&#8217;s what you want to do then an old recipe made with old methods might do the trick. I think you&#8217;re risking infection or other faults (if bad luck should strike, <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2009/12/03/mulled-wine/" rel="nofollow">mulling spices</a> might save the day).</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d rather make good mead consistently with modern methods, then curl up with <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0553381687?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=washinwinema-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0553381687" rel="nofollow">A Game of Thrones</a> or another good book. Have you read the Song of Ice and Fire books? The author has been taking his time with the latest installment, but it&#8217;s world class fantasy that&#8217;s perfect with a glass (or mug or tankard or &#8230;) of mead.</p>
<p>Erroll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuAllaidh</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/comment-page-1/#comment-35209</link>
		<dc:creator>CuAllaidh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/#comment-35209</guid>
		<description>I thought I&#039;d comment on Mrs. Coager question about how they made mead back in the day, a great source for that info is in The Closet of Sir Kenelm Digby Knight Opened published in the 17th century. One recipe called &quot;Weak Honey Drink&quot; would be something that you could whip up by the fire while camping with no more tools than a pot spoon and a towel, and thus is likely very like the mead that would have been made since prehistory. I plan on making this myself this summer at least once. 

And one must remember humanity has been making mead back to before recorded history, as such it was an ancient artform by the birth of the roman empire. Methods for ensuring sterility and making a well balanced beverage, while not as scientific, were well known even in the days of Aristotle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I&#8217;d comment on Mrs. Coager question about how they made mead back in the day, a great source for that info is in The Closet of Sir Kenelm Digby Knight Opened published in the 17th century. One recipe called &#8220;Weak Honey Drink&#8221; would be something that you could whip up by the fire while camping with no more tools than a pot spoon and a towel, and thus is likely very like the mead that would have been made since prehistory. I plan on making this myself this summer at least once. </p>
<p>And one must remember humanity has been making mead back to before recorded history, as such it was an ancient artform by the birth of the roman empire. Methods for ensuring sterility and making a well balanced beverage, while not as scientific, were well known even in the days of Aristotle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erroll</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/comment-page-1/#comment-34762</link>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/#comment-34762</guid>
		<description>Hello Rich,

I often reuse yeast just as you are doing. The biggest risk is infection, but adding sulfited must onto the lees immediately after racking is a good way to minimize that risk. So keep at it, but be quick, pay attention to cleanliness and sanitation, and be alert for off tastes or smells.

Erroll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Rich,</p>
<p>I often reuse yeast just as you are doing. The biggest risk is infection, but adding sulfited must onto the lees immediately after racking is a good way to minimize that risk. So keep at it, but be quick, pay attention to cleanliness and sanitation, and be alert for off tastes or smells.</p>
<p>Erroll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/comment-page-1/#comment-34751</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/#comment-34751</guid>
		<description>Hi Erroll,
Thanks for sharing your knowledge of winemaking as well as describing your learning experiences.
At the beginning of this month I started my second batch of mead. I used the yeast (ICV-D47) left behind in the fermenter after racking batch #1. The fermentation in batch 2 began vigorously. The SG dropped from 1.105 to 1.028 in three weeks. Today, I racked batch #2 and plan to begin batch #3 tomorrow, again using the left-over yeast. Is there any reason not to continue using the same culture indefinitely?
Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Erroll,<br />
Thanks for sharing your knowledge of winemaking as well as describing your learning experiences.<br />
At the beginning of this month I started my second batch of mead. I used the yeast (ICV-D47) left behind in the fermenter after racking batch #1. The fermentation in batch 2 began vigorously. The SG dropped from 1.105 to 1.028 in three weeks. Today, I racked batch #2 and plan to begin batch #3 tomorrow, again using the left-over yeast. Is there any reason not to continue using the same culture indefinitely?<br />
Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erroll</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/comment-page-1/#comment-33158</link>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/#comment-33158</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeremy,



&lt;blockquote&gt;Now, it is very dry and I am not sure if it will get any better&lt;/blockquote&gt;

When you say it like that, it sounds like dryness is a defect - not so! Personally, I like dry mead very much, but you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2008/12/09/sweetening-wine-an-example/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;easily sweeten your mead&lt;/a&gt; if you like. It&#039;s best to wait until the mead is clear, then stabilize and sweeten with honey or sugar syrup. Follow these steps:

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/27/a-simple-mead-recipe-fining-with-bentonite/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fine with bentonite&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Dissolve sorbate, according to the manufacturer&#039;s directions, in a little bit of water and place it in a new carboy with one campden tablet per gallon (or equivilent of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/08/measuring-sulfite/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sulfite&lt;/a&gt;) and the desired amount of honey or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2009/02/09/know-your-ingredients-sugar/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sugar syrup&lt;/a&gt;. Rack the clear mead into this carboy.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Take a specific gravity (SG) reading and monitor the airlock over the next month, then take another SG reading. If there is no airlock activity and the SG readings are the same, you can go ahead and bottle. If not, you may have renewed fermentation and you should monitor it for another month (this would be a good time to rack if you have more sediment).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If you do have renewed fermentation, you should let it run it&#039;s course. When it has (stable SG, no airlock activity), then you can either bottle or try to stabilize and sweeten again.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

It looks like you&#039;re aiming for a quick sweet mead, and I think this procedure will get you there. I really liked aged dry meads. If you&#039;ve never made one, I urge you to try it sometime - you might be pleasantly surprised. Anyway, I hope this helps and that you let me know how it turns out.

Erroll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeremy,</p>
<blockquote><p>Now, it is very dry and I am not sure if it will get any better</p></blockquote>
<p>When you say it like that, it sounds like dryness is a defect &#8211; not so! Personally, I like dry mead very much, but you can <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2008/12/09/sweetening-wine-an-example/" rel="nofollow">easily sweeten your mead</a> if you like. It&#8217;s best to wait until the mead is clear, then stabilize and sweeten with honey or sugar syrup. Follow these steps:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/27/a-simple-mead-recipe-fining-with-bentonite/" rel="nofollow">Fine with bentonite</a>.</li>
<li>Dissolve sorbate, according to the manufacturer&#8217;s directions, in a little bit of water and place it in a new carboy with one campden tablet per gallon (or equivilent of <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/08/measuring-sulfite/" rel="nofollow">sulfite</a>) and the desired amount of honey or <a href="http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2009/02/09/know-your-ingredients-sugar/" rel="nofollow">sugar syrup</a>. Rack the clear mead into this carboy.</li>
<li>Take a specific gravity (SG) reading and monitor the airlock over the next month, then take another SG reading. If there is no airlock activity and the SG readings are the same, you can go ahead and bottle. If not, you may have renewed fermentation and you should monitor it for another month (this would be a good time to rack if you have more sediment).</li>
<li>If you do have renewed fermentation, you should let it run it&#8217;s course. When it has (stable SG, no airlock activity), then you can either bottle or try to stabilize and sweeten again.</li>
</ul>
<p>It looks like you&#8217;re aiming for a quick sweet mead, and I think this procedure will get you there. I really liked aged dry meads. If you&#8217;ve never made one, I urge you to try it sometime &#8211; you might be pleasantly surprised. Anyway, I hope this helps and that you let me know how it turns out.</p>
<p>Erroll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/comment-page-1/#comment-33152</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/#comment-33152</guid>
		<description>Erroll, 
I moved my simple mead into the secondary today. It was in the primary for about 6 weeks. I got some advise from a friend to leave in the primary that amount of time. Now, it is very dry and I am not sure if it will get any better. The O.G. was 1.075, it is now at 0.992, if my calculations are correct, it&#039;s about 11.25%, but really dry. Is there anything I can do to sweeten it up a little or should I wait to see what else happens? I don&#039;t think it is terrible, just not on the track I wanted to be headed. You thoughts?
-Jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erroll,<br />
I moved my simple mead into the secondary today. It was in the primary for about 6 weeks. I got some advise from a friend to leave in the primary that amount of time. Now, it is very dry and I am not sure if it will get any better. The O.G. was 1.075, it is now at 0.992, if my calculations are correct, it&#8217;s about 11.25%, but really dry. Is there anything I can do to sweeten it up a little or should I wait to see what else happens? I don&#8217;t think it is terrible, just not on the track I wanted to be headed. You thoughts?<br />
-Jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erroll</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/comment-page-1/#comment-32123</link>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/#comment-32123</guid>
		<description>Hi Lucas,

It sounds like you&#039;re leading an exciting life!

Beer yeast will work in making mead, though it might impart beer-like flavor to the mead.

The diammonium phosphate is a nutrient, and I&#039;m not sure what you could find in a grocery store that would be a good substitute. Sometimes yeast hulls are used as a nutrient. These are dead yeast cells that have been processed to make the nutrients they contain available to live yeast. Maybe you can get that in a health food store. Another thought: if you&#039;re using beer yeast, why not use a little malt extract? The malt is a good source of nutrient, but it may make your mead a little more beer like. I&#039;ve never done this, so I&#039;m not really sure how much you should use.

If I were making a 20 liter (5 gallon) batch of mead and I had to use malt extract for the nutrients, I would try 1 liter (quart) of malt extract, 3 liters (quarts) honey, and 16 liters (4 gallons) water. Double check the SG once you mix all of this up.

Hope this helps,
Erroll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lucas,</p>
<p>It sounds like you&#8217;re leading an exciting life!</p>
<p>Beer yeast will work in making mead, though it might impart beer-like flavor to the mead.</p>
<p>The diammonium phosphate is a nutrient, and I&#8217;m not sure what you could find in a grocery store that would be a good substitute. Sometimes yeast hulls are used as a nutrient. These are dead yeast cells that have been processed to make the nutrients they contain available to live yeast. Maybe you can get that in a health food store. Another thought: if you&#8217;re using beer yeast, why not use a little malt extract? The malt is a good source of nutrient, but it may make your mead a little more beer like. I&#8217;ve never done this, so I&#8217;m not really sure how much you should use.</p>
<p>If I were making a 20 liter (5 gallon) batch of mead and I had to use malt extract for the nutrients, I would try 1 liter (quart) of malt extract, 3 liters (quarts) honey, and 16 liters (4 gallons) water. Double check the SG once you mix all of this up.</p>
<p>Hope this helps,<br />
Erroll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/comment-page-1/#comment-32114</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/#comment-32114</guid>
		<description>Hi Erroll,
First I want to say that this is awesome.  I´ve started to meke beer about a year ago and I have had a lot of good luck and fun.  I would now love to start making mead but I have a problem.  I moved from the US to Latin America and I can´t seem to find a beer or wine making store anywhere and I don´t know what diammonium phosphate is in Spanish.  Anyways my questions are:  Are there any substitutes that I can use that I may find at a regular grocery store?  And, as far as the yeast I have found a beer yeast in a natural food store.  Would that be suficient in making mead?  Thanks alot.

Lucas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Erroll,<br />
First I want to say that this is awesome.  I´ve started to meke beer about a year ago and I have had a lot of good luck and fun.  I would now love to start making mead but I have a problem.  I moved from the US to Latin America and I can´t seem to find a beer or wine making store anywhere and I don´t know what diammonium phosphate is in Spanish.  Anyways my questions are:  Are there any substitutes that I can use that I may find at a regular grocery store?  And, as far as the yeast I have found a beer yeast in a natural food store.  Would that be suficient in making mead?  Thanks alot.</p>
<p>Lucas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erroll</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/comment-page-1/#comment-31879</link>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/#comment-31879</guid>
		<description>Jeremy,

I&#039;d love to hear about your progress. I think most meadmakers aim for a higher specific gravity than 1.075. I often target 1.090, but Brother Adam, the famous meadmaker of Buckfast Abbey, liked to make low gravity meads. So finish this mead and see how you like it. Make another batch at a higher gravity and see if you and your girlfriend (don&#039;t leave her out!) like that one. Then you&#039;ll know better if you like higher or lower gravity in your mead.

Erroll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear about your progress. I think most meadmakers aim for a higher specific gravity than 1.075. I often target 1.090, but Brother Adam, the famous meadmaker of Buckfast Abbey, liked to make low gravity meads. So finish this mead and see how you like it. Make another batch at a higher gravity and see if you and your girlfriend (don&#8217;t leave her out!) like that one. Then you&#8217;ll know better if you like higher or lower gravity in your mead.</p>
<p>Erroll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/comment-page-1/#comment-31874</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwinemaker.com/blog/2007/05/06/a-simple-mead/#comment-31874</guid>
		<description>Erroll, 
Yes, you helped a lot. I wasn&#039;t worried that the mead was bad. I just did not know if it was exactly going to be mead or some sort of cider. My girlfriend and I did the mead saturday and it is still fermenting like a slow/little beer. I will keep you informed, if you like? Is 1.075  low for a mead or is that just me?
Thanks again,
-Jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erroll,<br />
Yes, you helped a lot. I wasn&#8217;t worried that the mead was bad. I just did not know if it was exactly going to be mead or some sort of cider. My girlfriend and I did the mead saturday and it is still fermenting like a slow/little beer. I will keep you informed, if you like? Is 1.075  low for a mead or is that just me?<br />
Thanks again,<br />
-Jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
